The table and the bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston, Texas.
The table illustrates the percentage of commuters using each means of transport to work and their average age in Houston, Texas. The bar chart shows the amount of CO2 emitted per person per kilometre caused by various forms of transport.
In general, people driving alone are the most methods of transports while cycling and walk are the least popular ones. Cyclists and pedestrians cause the least amount of pollution in contrast to people driving automobiles to work.
As is presented in the table, cars are the most popular vehicle, preferred by 48% of persons. This is followed by public transport at 37%. On the contrary, only 4% of travellers cycle or walk to work. Nevertheless, the average age of commuters is quite similar to others. People travelling by train or bus have the highest average age with 47. The youngest group are the traveller who enjoys walking or cycling at 39 on average.
Now, turning to the bar chart, the CO2 emissions from car drivers without passengers reach a peak of about 0.35kg. Also, people going together by car are the second most CO2 emissions at about 0.1 kilograms. On the other hand, cycling or walking hit the lowest point with 0-kilogram CO2 emissions. Besides, trains or buses have roughly 0.01 kilograms per person per kilometre.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | becky123bts | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-30 | golemzzz2006 | 54 | view |
| 2021-09-30 | golemzzz2006 | 67 | view |
- The table and the bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas 54
- Describe a journey you made where you learned something new 49
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small commun 61
- The table and the bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, nevertheless, second, so, while, in contrast, in general, in contrast to, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96759259259 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58284792333 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1160559096 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.6428571429 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154988333463 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495752392156 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532466743327 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887064189688 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465312137236 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.