The table and the bar chart below give the information about traveling to work in Houston, Texas
The table and the bar chart illustrate the percentage of travelers using different commuters to work in Houston, Texas, their average ages, and how much carbon dioxide do the transports produce. People who use public transports such as cars or trains/buses have a higher percentage, between 37 and 48. On the other hand, sharing a car to go to work is only 11 percent. While cyclists and walkers have the lowest percentage, which is 4 percent. People who go by trains or buses, at 47, three or four years older than using private cars. However, travelers using private cars, are 43-44, four or five years older than those who use cycle or go on foot. Commuters which are cars for driver-only produce the most carbon dioxide. People using public transports and cycling/walking produce a tiny amount. Overall, cars with just a driver are the most common means of transport to work and cause more pollution than all the other means of transport combined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-02 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | becky123bts | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-30 | golemzzz2006 | 54 | view |
| 2021-09-30 | golemzzz2006 | 67 | view |
- The table and the bar chart below give the information about traveling to work in Houston Texas 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 92
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 56
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they know only a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small commun 61
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84049079755 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6046828531 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7397642981 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101518921922 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408210966967 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749085502364 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101518921922 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.