The table and chart below show the domestic water use and cost in 5 countries.
The bar chart represents the consumption of water in US, Canada, Italy, France and Germany and the table gives data on how much money that residents pay for 1 cubic meter of water in these 5 countries shown.
Overall, the amount of water used in US families is the highest. In contrast, the cost of water in this countries is the lowest.
Mentioning to the bar chart first, the quantity of liters of water manipulated in Germany is the lowest, which stands at around 210 liters. Above that number, the amount of water used in France is about 40 liters higher than that used in Germany, whereas the utilization of water in France and Italy ranks 2nd and 3rd respectively. The amount of water consumed in the United States is the largest with a total number of about 310 liters.
Switching to the table, the cost for 1 cubic meter of water in France is the highest ($2.1 per cubic meter), while the cost of water per a cubic meter in the US is the cheapest, with only 1/210 of the figure for that in France. Water cost in Germany is rather high ($1.35 per cubic meter), ranks the second in the comparison of the five countries. In Italy and Canada, people pay a bit lower for water consumption with $0.7 and $0.31 per cubic respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-18 | Giang Tran | 71 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...hest. In contrast, the cost of water in this countries is the lowest. Mentioning...
^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hile the cost of water per a cubic meter in the US is the cheapest, with only 1/2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47787610619 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34888662655 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46017699115 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2838923957 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265023688995 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127063905713 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656113202194 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188459776972 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605750561234 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.