The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
The table illustrates how much money was contributed by different organizations, and the pie charts give information about the percentage of the money spent in a particular area in the UK in 2017 and 2018.
Overall, the number of money on the police budget had an upward trend. Salaries contributed to the highest proportion while people spent the least money on technology.
The total money on the police budget accounted for 304.7m in 2017 and increased to 318.6m in 2018. The budget from the National Government steadily rose to 177.8m which was the highest figure on the table. 2 times money more Local Taxes than other sources were contributed to the police budget in 2017, and both slightly increased in 2018, at 102.3m and 38.5m respectively.
The majority of the police budget goes to salaries which were for officers and staff, dropping slightly from 78% to 69%, but it remained the highest proportion on the chart. Buildings and transportation spent the same percentage of money, at 17% while the figure for technology significantly rose from 8% to 14%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-23 | jenifer Le | view | |
| 2023-11-03 | christine112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | christine112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | jenifer Le | 73 | view |
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles 61
- 28 5 2016 Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Many people use distance learning programmes study material post TV the Internet to study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending colleagues or university To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logy significantly rose from 8% to 14%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00561797753 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78511767155 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6489905382 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320492226744 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132933298254 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874077985552 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1934961125 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893310023651 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.