The table below gives information about the average annual spending by university students in three different countries in 2007. It shows their total average spending and their spending on various different living costs.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the yearly mean expenses in total and in various categories of higher education students from three countries in 2007.
It is clear that among the three nations, undergraduates from country A spend the largest sum of money while those from country C pay the least. Additionally, a huge proportion of money is spent on accommodation and food.
Students from country A were the biggest spenders among the three, at $5000 on average, followed by $4500 expenditure by averagely one student from country B. The expenditures for student housing in both country A and B were proportionally highest, about 45% and 35% respectively. The figures for food and leisure activities in these two places were relatively considerable, each of which took up 20% to 30% of the total expenses.
In country C, every student spent only $1500 annually, which was significantly less than the other two nations. The largest proportion of expenditure here was for meals, accounting for 36% in total, marginally bigger than 30% for housing. While country A and B students spent so little on books (3% and 9% respectively), country C students used over 20% of their sum for learning materials. Leisure and other expenses took up insignificantly around 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-01 | Trang Duong | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | Trang Duong | 73 | view |
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 78
- One of major issues facing world today is over population What problem arise from this situation What measures can be taken to deal with it 78
- Table showing percentages of water use for domestic industrial and agricultural sectors in 6 countries in 2003
- We are now living in a throwaway culture using things for a short time and then throwing them away instead of fixing What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 89
- Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today s world and should be closed What problems do zoos bring What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ee nations, undergraduates from country A spend the largest sum of money while those fr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10243902439 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03697617232 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1464757476 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173824184909 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677093147898 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577938867943 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115012202097 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325569279739 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.