The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%">The table
compares the average expenditure of college pupils among 3 different countries
namely A, B and C. <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%">Overall, the
amount of money which country A’s young people spent accounted for the largest
part in total spending among 3 countries. In addition, students in all
countries spent the highest proportion of their budget for accommodation and
food.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%">Students in
country A consumed a total of $5000 per year, compared to $4500 and $1500 for
those in countries B and C respectively. In term of accommodation, the
percentage of an average yearly expenses of young people in country A was
highest, at 45%; followed by that in country B and C, at 35% and 3%
respectively. By contrast, students in country C spent more in food, which
accounted 36% in total spending. The figures for country A and B were 22% and 28%
respectively. <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;line-height:107%">There was
the similar proportion of spending in leisure between A and B, at 22% and 28%;
where as the figure for C was lower considerably; just 12%. 21% of total
spending of university students in country C was for books, compared to 9% of A
and 3% of B. Students in all countries spent lowest proportion on others, which
accounted for 8%, 5% and 1% of their yearly expenses.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-28 kh12 61 view
2019-03-28 kh12 56 view
2019-03-28 kh12 67 view
2018-12-19 Nguyễn Thị Hường 11 view
2017-02-15 Vuong Linh 91 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 24, column 1, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...isure between A and B, at 22% and 28%; where as the figure for C was lower considerably...
^^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 40, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the lowest'.
Suggestion: spent the lowest
... and 3% of B. Students in all countries spent lowest proportion on others, which accounted ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, as for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.84888888889 4.92477711251 139% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.28542838252 2.65546596893 350% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.6294104753 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.222222222 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 23.0 3.83414634146 600% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136083167079 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909010233787 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552619627802 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575294208265 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653958009458 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 13.2329268293 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 22.75 11.4140731707 199% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.