The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table with two columns demonstrates that the comparison of capita distance by various transports in mile between 1985 and 2000.
It is clear that the data about the main seven and other models of transportation were collected. Overall, the aggregate traveling distance grew from 4740 miles in 1985 by about 1700 miles in 2000. Moreover, compared with other models, cars(3200 in 1985 and 4800 in 2000) always was the most popular vehicles in England whenever the figures were collected.
In England, expect local bus, people traveled more distance by long-distance bus, train, taxi and other vehicles with various amplification in the initiation of the century, while it is noteworthy that the amounts of the rise by these models of transportation were dozens or hundreds in distances. In contrast, the numbers of walking, bicycle and local bus shrank in the 15 years.
In conclusion, the importance of different vehicles occupied similar proportions in 2 separated years.
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
- The tables below 11
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and local bus shrank in the 15 years. In conclusion, the importance of different...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26282051282 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89024379672 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9590236211 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185316065252 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820344895295 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716219440228 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10381226906 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834625139546 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.