The table indicates how many average miles that English people travelled by using different sorts of transport in the year 1985-2000.
Overall, the total of miles proliferated considerably in 2000 in comparison with that in 1985. Moreover, the figure of travelling by car was much higher than other modes of transport in both years.
The year 1985 witnessed an outstanding number of miles in travelling by car which totaled 3199 miles. This figure rose to reach 4806 miles in 2000, presenting the longest distance among eight given categories of transport. Likewise, people travelled more by train, long distance bus and taxi. Other means of transport were similar in terms of increase with a growth of 85 miles in 2000.
In contrast, the left means of transport were seen in a downward trend in figure. Between the two studied years, the sum of miles for travelling by walking and bicycle dwindled by 18 miles and 10 miles respectively. Remarkably, local bus saw a slump in average distance per person which plummeted from 429 miles to 274 miles in 2000.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. 73
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 46
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99438202247 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6645150022 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601123595506 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2338824747 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159213472451 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690226948127 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451253386 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118970250098 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418340381102 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.