The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The given table shows the figures about travel distance per person in different modes between 1985 and 2000.
It is clear that there is a considerable increase in the average distance which one person travels in a year with cars being the most common transportation in both 1985 and 2000. Additionally, the least useful vehicle transferred from taxis to bicycles.
Looking at the details, in 1985, one person averaged travelled 3199 miles by car and at the turn of the twentieth-one century, this data increased to 4806 miles. The second ranked in the table shown was other modes used, about 450 and 585 miles in 1985 and 2000 respectively. By contrast, a significant difference can be seen in the distance that people travelled by taxis in 1985 compared to other datas, at just 13 miles per person.
In addition, there were opposite trends between the datas by using feet, bicycle and local bus and that using the long distance bus, taxi and train to go. It is noticeable that the distances per person by walking and riding bikes decreased slightly whereas the figure of using local buses to travel nearly reduced by half, from 429 to 274 miles. That in contrast with the growing popularity of long distance buses, which double the distance after 15 years.
- The chart below show the main reason for study among people of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 84
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., in 1985, one person averaged travelled 3199 miles by car and at the turn of the...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going', 'gonna'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: going; gonna
...g the long distance bus, taxi and train to go. It is noticeable that the distances pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52324158848 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578703703704 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4207239879 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20895721508 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101495283821 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117235405924 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169428752784 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128066220838 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.