The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The mentioned table illustrates the data on different modes of travel that were popular in England between the year 1985 and 2000.
In general, most people preferred car as the best mode of travel in both the years. However, only few people preferred taxi and bicycle in both the years.
As can be seen from the table, the car was the most popular mode of travel in 1985 and 2000 and accounted for average of 3199 miles and 4806 miles respectively. However, there was a slight decrement of 18 miles in the average miles of walking in the year 2000.Also,the average miles of bicycle dropped significantly from 51 miles to 41 miles. In addition to this, it is noticeable that there was a drastic decline of 429 to 274 miles with that of local bus in the year 11985 and 2000 respectively.
It is clear from the table that the long distance bus doubled the average miles in 2000 with 124 miles. Likewise, there was a slight rose in the train with the average miles of 77 in the year 2000 as that of 1985.Moreover,the taxi had three-fold the average miles as that of 1985(13 miles).Furthermore, the other modes of travel exceeded to 585 miles from 450 miles in the year 2000.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 67
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 92
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...erage miles of walking in the year 2000.Also,the average miles of bicycle dropped si...
^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...e miles of walking in the year 2000.Also,the average miles of bicycle dropped signif...
^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...00 with 124 miles. Likewise, there was a slight rose in the train with the averag...
^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
... of 77 in the year 2000 as that of 1985.Moreover,the taxi had three-fold the average mil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...n the year 2000 as that of 1985.Moreover,the taxi had three-fold the average miles a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...e average miles as that of 198513 miles.Furthermore, the other modes of travel exceeded to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61320754717 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66971131221 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438679245283 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9968497184 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187583676658 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1099814452 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109191202472 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162151757255 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124323407291 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.