The table compares different Britain companies standing at the highest positions in terms of 5 criterion. The given data is conducted by a national newspaper via a survey of staff.
Overall, it can be seen that the fifth corporation has the best working conditions for staff to develop and promote in their chosen field. Moreover, there are significant differences in the examined firms regarding to each compared criterion.
According to the surveyed information, the fifth company has the largest-scale, with the number of staff is 190 people, nearly third times as many as other subjects. Besides, the majority of labor recruited are young people with 93% of the total employees are people aged under 35 years old. In contrast, the under 35s/ over 55s fractions of other companies are much lower with 77%/0%, 59%/1%, 82%/0%, 26%/8% based on the survey's position.
It is obvious that the ratio between two genders in the second and the fifth small companies are relatively equal with around a half of staff are men and the rest are women. However, the trend is reversed in the 3 remaining companies. In terms of staff turnover aspect, the frequency of leaving jobs in the first, third, and the fourth companies is at the low rate, all recorded data are below 15%, whereas the figures for the 2nd and the last companies are much higher, at 18% and 33%, respectively.
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 73
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 73
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows changes to one university campus 96
- Some people think personal happiness is directly related to economic success while others believe this depends on other factors Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'criterion' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'criteria', 'criterions'.
Suggestion: criteria; criterions
... at the highest positions in terms of 5 criterion. The given data is conducted by a natio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... to develop and promote in their chosen field. Moreover, there are significant differ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, third, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91810344828 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63256934825 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4657552008 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261255065083 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905015096432 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698401887707 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152544511034 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713581911188 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.