The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the number of native speakers of six languages and the number of speakers of these languages as an additional language.
Overall, as can be seen, it is noticeable that Mandarin Chinese has the highest citizens who speak Mandarin Chinese language. In addition, it can divide into three groups which are similar in number including Mandarin Chinese and English, Hindi and Spanish, Arabic and Portuguese.
The figures for people speaking Mandarin Chinese and English are higher than other languages, at 1090 million and 942 million respectively. It is remarkable that 900 million of Mandarin Chinese use it as a first language, compared to 190 million of people speak this language as a second language. By contrast, the number of native people of English is only 339 million, while the figure for native speakers of English as an additional language is 603 million.
Likewise, the total number of speakers of Hindi and Spanish are 490 million and 420 million respectively, when it comes to using these languages as a second language the number for Hindi (120 million) is under 2 times higher than that for Spanish. Also, native speakers of Arabic and Portuguese account for lower proportions, at only 206 million and 203 million respectively. However, the number of Arabic speakers as an additional language is nearly 2.5 times higher than those of Portuguese as a second language (10 million).
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006. 67
- Lifestyles and culture in many countries is becoming similar is it positive or negative 68
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people prefer to work for the same company, whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently. Write about the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint? 78
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, likewise, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12931034483 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72434252833 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461206896552 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6367670677 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.222222222 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.061449706791 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346058481229 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338996911722 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490221528252 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374382742635 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.