The table manifests data regarding the number of native speakers of six different languages as well as the number of speakers as an additional language.
Overall, the number of Mandarian Chinese speakers has dominance over other five languages, while English is spoken by highest number of people as an additional language.
The native speakers of Mandrian Chinese are the highest ( 900 million), whereas only 190 million people speak the Mandrian Chinese as an additional language. In contrast to this, the number of speakers of English as an additional language are more than twice than that of the native speakers.
For 370 million people Hindi is the first language, but one- third of speakers has Hindi as an additional language. When it comes to Spanish, it is spoken by 70 million people as an additional language, whereas count of native speakers of Spanish is five times higher than people having it as an additional language. The native speakers of Arabic and Portuguese are 206 million and 203 million, respectively. However the count of speakers of Arabic as an additional language is kore than double than that of number of speakers of Portuguese as an additional language.
- Some people think they have the right to use as much as fresh water they want others believe government should control the use of water as it limited resource Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The world has been an enormous increase in flight for leisure business and commercial purposes around the world over recent years What do you think are the main advantages and disadvantages of such flights Do you think flights should be taxed more 63
- The table illustrates the population size of 10 major countries in the year 2010 and 2100 The figures demonstrate a clear increase in population size in 2100 compared to 2010 100
- In many countries these days the number of people continuing their education after school has increased and the range of courses available at universities and colleges has also increased Do you think this as a positive or negative development 73
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kers of Mandrian Chinese are the highest 900 million, whereas only 190 million pe...
^^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... million and 203 million, respectively. However the count of speakers of Arabic as an a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, third, well, whereas, while, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11794871795 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72724100952 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405128205128 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2879769241 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953342747402 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626682397267 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358262910477 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793522202407 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410553088644 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.