The table below gives information about past and projected population figures in various countries for different years.
The given table illustrates information about demographic statistics in four countries, namely Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States, between the year 1990 and 2050.
Regarding the United States, there is a dramatic rise, increasing from 249.9 million in 1990 to 275.1 million in 2000, which is predicted to 349 million in 2050. Undergoing a similar upward trend, the figure for population in Canada experienced a gradual growth by 4.4 million over ten-year period, followed by predicting increasingly to 39 million in 2050.
Turning to Australia demographic, it comprised the highest growth rate, expecting a substantial increase to 26 million in 2050. However, New Zealand the least living preferred country with an average initial 3.4 million and also rose by 0.3 million in 2000, which is predicted witnessing slight rise to 4.7 million.
Overall, all four countries saw an upward trend despite New Zealand grew at less lower rate. Every country is forecasted to higher rate of population growth over the period.
- The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001 33
- Recently some people can work from home using modern technology. Some think this only benefits the workers, but not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? 78
- Writing, reading and maths are the three major subjects. Some people think that computer skills should be added as a fourth subject. What extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less low', 'less lowe'?
Suggestion: less low; less lowe
...pward trend despite New Zealand grew at less lower rate. Every country is forecasted to hi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39877300613 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76818354739 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2534061417 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950377913441 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500863356005 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419464443839 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063780485557 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300925276503 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.