In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The increasing of infrastructure in the world today in many countries continues to be a controversial topic, with some people claiming that investment in very fast trains is proper and worthy. There are arguments on both sides of this very topical debate, and I will discuss them now.
On the one hand, some people feel that railway construction uses up the budget which could be better spent on public transport. In addition, low-cost facility such a coach can give an opportunity for all citizen, ranging student to businessmen. The government will receive a lot of fares caused by a huge number of transporting users. An increasing number of public transport will mean less personal car on the road or even traffic jam. Furthermore, public transport which probably reached to almost area, picking people up along the way. Another reason is that ruined coaches can be replaced or alternated with other coaches, leading public transport flows consecutively. Finally, current streets are provided in all part of country which ready to use and no more money to implement.
On the other hand, If the quality of public transport is unpleasant, it may be ignored by users. The government can survey route which always used and set railway station, constructed like a hub of transportation. At this place, a lot of car park is provided then users can park their personal cars and travel by fast trains. From this point, we can diminish intense traffic or even accident relatively pedestrians. Moreover, there are different kinds of train which selected in different cases. For example, sky train should be set at flooded areas and underground can be placed beneath the intense city. Finally, infrastructure like express trains is the sustainable vehicle, releasing low exhaust, clashing at low probability and working for long hours.
In conclusion, I feel that increasing railway construction is necessary in some areas. This outweighs their disadvantages, as long as its cost stays the reasonable price.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 48
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region 11
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of cars'.
Suggestion: a lot of cars
...a hub of transportation. At this place, a lot of car park is provided then users can park th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19076923077 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91674780389 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590769230769 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9608770052 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215410678593 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631187902948 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494542252413 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122902255019 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224995781512 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.