The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts present change in annual expenditure in typical school in the UK in the year 1981, 1991 and 2001. The charts also show a further classification by the purpose of using money.
Overall, it is clear that teachers' salaries were the main cost during 1981 and 2001. There were noticeable differences in furniture and equipment, insurance, resources and other workers' salaries.
In 1981, the annual cost of hiring teachers had the largest proportion of total expenditure at 40% increasing by 10% in 1991, the declining slightly to 45% in 2001. Likewise, spending on resources, such as books, which started at 15%, before increasing dramatically to 20% and tailing off to just 9% over the period.
Turning to furniture and equipment, it experienced 15% in the initial year rising to 5% in 1991, followed by a substantial increase at 23% over ten-year period. While between 1981 and 2001, the figure for other workers' salaries witnessed a fluctuation between 26% and 23%, the figure for insurance made up to 2%, grew gradually to 8% in the same period as other four parts.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-02 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
2023-08-18 | hau le | 73 | view |
2023-08-18 | hau le | 61 | view |
2023-08-17 | trikhung777 | 78 | view |
2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree??? 11
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 78
- Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99453551913 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77357800105 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617486338798 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7841603283 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20314698344 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955533079779 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115732656081 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135537449205 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1197471497 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.