The table below gives information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in 2 cities in May 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the temperatures and hours of daylight in 2 different cities namely Mumbai and Moscow in May 2007.
Overall, the average temperature in Mumbai was much higher than that of Moscow. In contrast, the hour of daylight in Mumbai was shorter than that in Moscow.
Looking at the tables in more detail, we can see that the temperature in Mumbai varied slightly from 29 to 35 degrees Celsius on Sunday, the hottest day. Meanwhile, Moscow is much colder, the temperature fluctuated from 10 to 9 degrees Celsius, being the warmest day in May 2007. Also, while the temperature variation in Mumbai was quite stable, that of Moscow showed a wild fluctuation.
Turning to the other category, in Mumbai, the sunrise started at 6. 00 AM, about 1 hour later than Moscow, at 4. 55 AM. Moreover, the sun set at 4. 01 pm, much sooner than Moscow, at 10. 04 pm, therefore, the hours of daylight in Mumbai was roughly 10 hours, much shorter than the amount of that in Moscow, at about 17 hours.
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 39
- The table below gives information about values NZ of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 73
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65536723164 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54328922595 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0212141354 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9090909091 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133897292528 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598261433678 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728800689164 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121240885116 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889495706729 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.