The table illustrates the amount of budget spent on three disparate goods and services which are food, drinks and tobacco, clothing and footwear and leisure and education in five nations including Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in the year 2002. The unit is measured in percentage.
Overall, it is evident that all the surveyed regions used the greatest expenditure/ allocation for food, drinks and tobacco and the least one for leisure and education in the given year. In addition, it was Turkey that allocated the largest sum of money for these categories compared to others.
As can be seen from the graph, in terms of food, drinks and tobacco, the figure for Turkey was over 32%, doubling that of Sweden which was approximately 16%. It is noticeable that the five mentioned countries used less than 5% of their money in total for leisure and education, especially Spain with just 1.98%.
In 2002, Turkey was the most generous consumer, spending over 43% of their money on the three given kinds of products. Moreover, both Italy and Spain shared virtually identical figures, with 28,56% and 27,29% respectively. Besides, the second biggest spender was Ireland with 37,46% and the most modest number, 24,39% of expenditure in the aggregate, was recorded for Sweden.
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 56
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Sweden) must be used with a third-person verb: 'surpasses'.
Suggestion: surpasses
...h. The other period observed Sweden surpass the USA in terms of the elderly populat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45161290323 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56280866971 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566820276498 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3205113613 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0256506351146 0.215688989381 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.011360541742 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0147619803972 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0175988418679 0.15604864568 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120048929084 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.