While wearing a uniform is a mandatory requirement for students in some high schools, others allow their students to wear plain clothes at school. From my perspective, I partially agree with the idea of uniforms for the following reasons.
On the one hand, I believe that a uniform can benefit the highschool as well as their students. Firstly, a uniform can define the school’s identity. In Vietnam, for example, the majority of highschools have their own uniforms, which vary in colors, designs and unique logos. This may bring the students a sense of unity and be helpful in identifying them at events where many highschools gather. Secondly, wearing uniforms can alleviate possible class discrimination in high schools. As students come from different socio-economic backgrounds, fancy clothes are something to flaunt their wealth and privilege. Hence, wearing similar outfits seems to be a feasible solution for this distraction, establishing a fair and positive education environment.
On the other hand, I suggest that a highschool uniform might negatively impact some groups of people, and one of them could be the low-income family. To illustrate, the average cost of a standard uniform set for Vietnamese highschool students is 500 thousands Vietnamese dong, which constitutes a considerable budget for impoverished households. This might place a heavy financial burden on them when they have to pay this extra money almost every academic year. Moreover, wearing uniforms can bring highschool students an uncomfortable feeling. For example, skirts and dresses restrict a range of movement, so that wearers must seriously consider how they sit and run. This can lead to inconvenience, and further, insecurity in high school students.
In conclusion, it is my belief that compulsory uniforms are important for highschool students. Nonetheless, it should be profitable and comfortable for all students.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that school children should be made to wear a uniform Others feel that children should be free to choose their own clothes do you agree or disagree with pupils wearing uniforms 78
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 89
- Today more people are overweight than ever before What in your opinion are the primary causes of this What measures can be taken to overcome this epidemic 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51186440678 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09483171402 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589830508475 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.833093277 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6470588235 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23374297755 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081103462756 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780867121035 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164912508998 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107204572164 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.