The given maps illustrate the main developments which took place in the city of Kimsville from 2002 to now.
Overall, Kimsville has notably witnessed significant innovation, with an increase in advanced facilities.
In detail, Kimsville has become a much more modern town, with a football stadium and new apartments constructed on the left-hand side of the map. As a result, some trees have been cut down to make way for these constructions. In addition, it is interesting to note that the area to the west of the city center used to be vacant in the year 2000, however, there is now a brand new train station, making traveling around the city more convenient.
Another striking change is that the environmentally unfriendly plant in the eastern part of the town disappeared and has been replaced by a large software enterprise. Moreover, the old cinema to the south of the central part of the town has been converted into a pub, while the shopping center to the north has remained its location.
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92352941176 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87454524762 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652941176471 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9006299058 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138946739982 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583829175058 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327599551886 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752284575765 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278275244656 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.