Technology has always been considered to be an essential part in the modern world. Nonetheless, it is believed that our daily activities have been complicated due to technological advancement, and eliminating it appears to be an effective way to simplify our life. I am a strong opponent of this idea and the justifications will be given in this essay.
First and foremost, the emerging automation technology has strongly facilitated household chores. Many decades ago, for example, housewives tended to find it challenging to prepare a whole meal. Nonetheless, the time allocated to cooking has been shortened considerably in recent years, thanks to the help of cutting-edge machines including an oil-free dryer and microwave oven. In other words, people now simply do some initial preparation and then watch TV shows, while the appliances are doing the rest.
In addition, as a result of the invention of the internet and high-tech gadgets, people can maintain their relationships much more easily compared to the past. To illustrate, smartphones have strengthened the connection between people in different places all around the world despite geographical distance, since a variety of media platforms allow users to communicate with each other via facetime and instant messages. Hence, relationships, including both friendship and business partnership, can remain stable without direct interaction.
Furthermore, a better education has been attributed to the innovative technology. One reason for this could be that most modern technological amenities at schools are to develop various curricula, making studying more efficient. Today, the majority of universities in Vietnam are equipped with projectors, which provides lecturers with a more interactive teaching method. Therefore, students seem to have a more profound understanding about theories in an active way and apply them into practice effectively with the support of technological gadgets.
For the above reasons, technology evolution has been necessary for society to sustainably develop. Thus, I suggest that people should use technology carefully instead of completely removing it.
- Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without that technology Do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'preparing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: preparing
...ousewives tended to find it challenging to prepare a whole meal. Nonetheless, the time all...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an active way" with adverb for "active"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e profound understanding about theories in an active way and apply them into practice effectivel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73208722741 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19929352844 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669781931464 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8898067834 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206300955522 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569978596432 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469817642291 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102490386271 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029442867101 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'preparing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: preparing
...ousewives tended to find it challenging to prepare a whole meal. Nonetheless, the time all...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an active way" with adverb for "active"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e profound understanding about theories in an active way and apply them into practice effectivel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73208722741 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19929352844 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669781931464 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8898067834 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206300955522 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569978596432 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469817642291 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102490386271 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029442867101 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.