The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

The table provides information on the people spent on various items in their daily life from five different countries in 2002.

It can be seen from the graph that in terms of food, drink and tobacco, both Turkey and Ireland had the highest proportion of expenditure on these items was nearly a third, while it was a moderate 28. 9% in Ireland. However, figures for other three given countries were an average 16% in 2002.

Clothing and footwear, on the other hand, the percentage of money spent on these materials, Italy spend on slightly higher at 9.00% than other four countries, where their expensive was between 5. 40% and 6. 63% respectively. Similarly, the proportion of leisure and education, both Italy and Sweeden spent almost the same amount of money, whereas Spain used only less amount merely at 1. 98% on these purposes. Interestingly, Turkey spent almost 2% higher than that of Ireland within the given year.

Overall, it is clear that the consumers expenditure on all items were various from region to region.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be seen from the graph that in terms of food, drink and tobacco, both Turkey ...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Italy) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...f money spent on these materials, Italy spend on slightly higher at 9.00% than other ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...year. Overall, it is clear that the consumers expenditure on all items were various f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ems were various from region to region.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, third, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95402298851 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55200888957 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626436781609 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.8767014309 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177860151814 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559597157276 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111808325099 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139863284263 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149893657442 0.0819641961636 183% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.