The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996,1998 and 2000 for 1996,1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia
The first map shows the current islip town's center and the second portray the development plan.
Overall, the old center of the town will have more spots. besides, there will be demolition and replacement of some location.
Presently in the town center, there is the main road running from west to east dividing it into two sections' as northern and southern part which have shops along with it on either side. In the north, the shops and the countryside is situated which will get replaced by a bus station, a huge shopping center and a car park. Furthermore, there is housing in the southern part which will get split into two sections in the future project. Moreover, there are two divergences from the main road in form of a by-road which lead to school and a park, one at the starting of the main road in the west and one in the east at the ending respectively leading to school and park.
According to the plan, The main road in the core of the islip town center will get replaced by pedestrians only pathway and shops right along with it in the south. Likewise, there is dual carriageway constructed in the form of a roundabout for transportation. Further, new housing will be constructed beside the car park and near the park. However, the school and park are kept at the same location but the park is downsized.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | nitish22 | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | Naive Dinosaur | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- in a number of countries , some people think it is more necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 73
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? 61
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996,1998 and 2000 for 1996,1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...enter of the town will have more spots. besides, there will be demolition and replaceme...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ections in the future project. Moreover, there are two divergences from the main ...
^^
Line 13, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ame location but the park is downsized.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, likewise, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64556962025 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53122359352 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476793248945 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2943038473 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0148905046984 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00959991669779 0.103423049105 9% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303576021129 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0091484979462 0.15604864568 6% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158456632557 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.