The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40-44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981.
The table provides Australian children born by women from 40-44 years in Australia between 1981 and 2006.
Overall, the percentage of Australian women had two children took the lead over the given period. Additionally, the gap widened over time, those who had two children approximately doubled the proportion of mothers of three (38,3% against 21,5%) and was four as high as those who had four or more children (38,3% versus 11%). In 1986, 35,6% of surveyed mothers had two children, roughly typing with those of that who had three children (27%) and twice as high as those who had four or more children (18,9%).
Another northworthy observation, the percentage of childless mothers has increased doubly over the course of 25 years from 1981 in 8,5% to 15,9% at the end of the given period. Likewise, there is a considerable increase in the ratio of those who had 1 child between 1981 and 2006 (7,6% versus 13,2%).
Featuring a notable change, those who had four or more children experienced a remarkable decline about two thirds from 11% in 2006 to 27,6% in 1981.
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What causes and what are the problems 61
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 84
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 84
- The given table shows the actual and projected population of Argentina Indonesia Italy and Republic of Korea for the years 2003 2025 and 2050 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsus 13,2%. Featuring a notable change, those who had four or more children expe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82967032967 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57058899603 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532967032967 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8564115002 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.571428571 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158902376067 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103488045206 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120341920568 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148207233363 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143602360273 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.