The provided table depicts average IELST band score in General training for its participants who speak German, French, Indonesian and Malay in 2010. It is obvious from the data, that all groups of participants aimed almost same overall results.
In listening, German speaking individuals gained the highest score, when Malay speakers the lowest, 6.8 and 6.2 respectively. However, in Reading, Malay's achieved the best score from all groups (6.4), when French and Indonesian speakers aimed same score (6.1).German and French speaking individuals gained average score with difference 0.1 point, 6.6 and 6.5 respectively. German speakers have excelled also in speaking, when their average score was 6.9, followed by Indonesian (6.7) and French and Malay with same result (6.6).
Overall score was the highest for group of German speaking participants (6.7), the worst result got Indonesian speaking students (6.3).
To sum up, people who took IELST General training whoms German is native language, achieved the highest score, in contrast to individuals with mother language Indonesian, who gained the lowest score in compared language groups.
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
- The trend of online shopping is increasing significantly. What effect does it have on the environment and society in general? 78
- the chart below shows the process of waste paper recycle 22
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.Others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own op 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: German
...ndonesian speakers aimed same score 6.1.German and French speaking individuals gained ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in contrast, in general, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56647398844 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59305095619 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 152.355636588 43.030603864 354% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 192.6 112.824112599 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6 5.23603664747 279% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234205988004 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139474035721 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731970959267 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156542858241 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513783077971 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 13.2329268293 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.62 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.