The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the results that students from different nations got from the IELTS General Test in 2010.
Looking at the table, it can be seen that German student got the highest mark in overall, while Indonesian one had the lowest score in total.
A closer look at data reveals that students from French and German groups took the largest scores in overall, with the number of 6.5 and 6.7 respectively. However, in terms of Speaking skill, German and Indonesian were on top, with the highest mark of 6.9 for German and the second greatest one (6.7) belong to Indonesian.
According to the table, the total average scores of Ielts Test of the last two students from Indonesia and Malaysia were much lower, with the figures of 6.3 and 6.4 in turn. However, the French and Indonesian students got the same score in Listening skill, whereas students from France and Malaysia both took 6.6 in speaking skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-17 | concatrencay | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-17 | concatrencay | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-28 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-06-06 | minhchau2205 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 87
- University should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- University should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 61
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87341772152 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33124558479 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.2269641527 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207148301602 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119357011922 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881717525494 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145533012063 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949666421388 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.