The table below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport Write a report for a university lecturer describing the infor

Essay topics:

The table below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The chart above shows the Carbon dioxide emitted from various types of transport in the European region. On the Y-axis different types of transport is mentioned and on X-axis grams of CO2 per passenger-KM is mentioned. Overall, it is seen that the highest amount of approximately 380 units of pollution is due to Air based transport and second in list is Passenger cars. The lowest contribution of around 35 units is given by Coaches. The emissions of Maritime and Rail is almost same upto 48 units.
The second chart is a Pie chart showing the percentage of Transport Funds of European union for year 2007-2008. The highest investment is done on the transportation through roadways. The above chart shows that 52% of total invested amount is utilized in roadways. The Railways stand second in list with 31% of overall funds. For Intermodal, inland waterways and Airports the least and equal 1% percentage of funds is invested.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-12 Vuthungan 89 view
2021-04-03 Firdouspathan 73 view
2020-10-22 Ajantha J 67 view
2020-06-23 dantesw view
2020-06-23 dantesw view
Essays by user Firdouspathan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... equal 1 percentage of funds is invested
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69968464323 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 156.0 22.4926829268 694% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 756.0 112.824112599 670% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 156.0 22.9334400587 680% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309700336746 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.309700336746 0.103423049105 299% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228448880224 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653199537908 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 79.4 13.2329268293 600% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -78.4 61.2550243902 -128% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 63.0 10.3012195122 612% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.03 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.52 8.06136585366 193% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 64.4 10.9970731707 586% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 11.0658536585 569% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.