The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall, a public place
for hiring over the period of three years.
The table compares data about annual income and expenditure of Harckley Hall during 3 years period.
Overall, while income from hiring room and tax declined, that from coffee saw a sharp rise over the period. Meanwhile, subsidies and profit tent to reduce.
In the first year, tax income was considerably higher as opposed to other sources, where 75.000 Euros were generated, while only 3000 Euros was brought from coffee. After a year, money from hiring room, coffee, and tax appeared to increase by 1000 Euros in the first two items and 3000 Euros with the last one. In contrast, funding from local council remained unchanged,while that from other bodies decreased by 2000 Euros.In the final year, all income sources saw a fall, whereas only the amount of money stemming from coffee continued rising to double of that in the first year surveyed.
In terms of annual expenditure of this public place, it saw a rise in the second stage by 8000 Euros before dropping to 71000 Euro in the final year. Profit of harkley Hall, similarly, witnessed a steady decrease from 9000 Euros in the initial stage to only 1000 Euros after 3 years period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-26 | phanhhh | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | LyleDUO | 95 | view |
| 2017-02-23 | mr.cuong95 | 57 | view |
| 2017-02-17 | kingnight153 | 84 | view |
| 2017-02-17 | kingnight153 | 74 | view |
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 65
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. 78
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures should be taken to tackle this problem? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ear, tax income was considerably higher as opposed to other sources, where 75.000 ...
^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...ng from local council remained unchanged,while that from other bodies decreased by 200...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...om other bodies decreased by 2000 Euros.In the final year, all income sources saw ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of that in the first year surveyed. In terms of annual expenditure of this pub...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Euros'.
Suggestion: Euros
... by 8000 Euros before dropping to 71000 Euro in the final year. Profit of harkley Ha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89230769231 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32865690861 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3847687741 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145768955741 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825769198303 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941689327275 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138112012452 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101589588366 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.