The table gives information about the number population in New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 followed by age group.
Overall, it is clear that while the people aged under 39 had a tendency of reduction, there was a sharp increase in the number of people aged over 40. In addition, the group of people from 15 to 39 was the most crowded; whereas the least for the old generation during the same time.
Looking at the chart, starting at more than 4 million people in 2011, the figure continued to increase gradually. It gained nearly 4,500,000 people in 2012 and the percentage of change was
60%. In addition, the proportion of the population under 15 and 13-39 aged was reduced to 0,2% in 2012, about 896,364 people and 1,574,102 people respectively.
Turning to these other factors, the number of 40-64 aged people was 1,331,907 in 2011, there was a minimal change in 2012, it raised to 0,6%, at 1,339,898 people. Finally, starting at 573,946 people in 2011, the number of elderly people was a minimal change, at 596,903 and it improved to 0,4% in 2012.
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 73
- The graph below shows percentage of workers in five European countries taking fixed stays or more sickness absence per year from 1991 to 2001 73
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly, starting at 573,946 people in 2011, the number of elderly people was a minim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73513513514 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47602971622 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2781402599 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251336441665 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138732699843 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173992704152 0.0843802449381 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194155654189 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20062415794 0.0819641961636 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.