The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and above in three countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the chart depicting the disparity in the percentage of upper-65 years old generation among three nations in a 42-year period starting from 1988. It is perceptible that Germany is by far the oldest country while the third term belonged to the UK. All three nations witnessed increasing tendency in the whole period.
Not only opposing the lowest starting point at only 14% in 1988, but the UK also has a small increasing rate over the next 12 years, over a decade, but the percentage of upper-65 years old generation was also recorded almost unchanged by surging 1%. However, experts predict that there will be a big change in the number of elderly in the UK in the next 3 decades, it will soar by 5% and catch up with the other old trending. Especially, 2030 is the time when the UK’s elderly number reach the peak, but it is still equal to the starting point of Germany.
On the other hand, Canada and Germany are the two countries that have the most stable surging rate over the 42-year period, around 5% in each gap. It is conspicuous that from the past to the future, there is a big disparity in the two numbers, Canada always less than 4% less than Germany which has the first rank among the three nations. The ending point of Germany was double and almost double than the UK and Canada, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-30 | Linh Nguyen Phan | view | |
| 2021-08-30 | Linh Nguyen Phan | view | |
| 2021-08-30 | Linh Nguyen Phan | 100 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | KEVA | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | tamle | 56 | view |
- In today s world private companies rather than the government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
- Many people are traveling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 67
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 89
- the diagram illustrates the design of single and double room study area 89
- Sample topic Children who start reading earlier in life perform better later on in their school studies How important are early reading skills in a child s academic performance What other preschool factors influence a child s later academic achievements 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, still, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55462184874 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36864507386 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3317999304 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0684081505313 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028907617436 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203746274808 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049118448169 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233718009109 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.