The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summari

Essay topics:

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The table illustrates the figures for tourisms to Ashdown Museum before it is reconstructed and come back when it is finished. The pie charts compare the percentage of visitors satisfied with the museum before refurbishment and after refurbishment.
Overall, it is clear that the number of visitors go to the museum after refurbishment higher than the number of visitors come before refurbishment. It can be seen that the proportion of people feel satisfied considerable increase, while the figure for visitor rate disatisfied reduce after refurbishment.
As can be seen that total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum sifnigicantly increase when the Museum is redecorated, from 74000 people to 92000 people.
There are increase by 20% in the number of visitors feel very satisfied after the Museum is improved. The figure for visitors satisfied also witness go up from 30% in the year before refurbishment to 40% in the year after refurbishment. In contrast, the percentage of visiyors dissatisfied with the Muuseum before improvement accounted for 40%. This figure significant decrease to 15 % after refurbishment. The number of visitors no respond remain the sảm between two condiditin of Ashdown Museum, while people very dissatisfied experience an decrease by half after refurbishment.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 67 view
2023-07-25 wfc 89 view
Essays by user Minh_Anh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 540, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ile people very dissatisfied experience an decrease by half after refurbishment.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.475 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23913839228 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1094840844 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305540513712 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145065712539 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781232300145 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206363205937 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513771447225 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.