The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map compares a southwest airport before and after the innovation.
Overall, it is noticeable that the position use for people go on foot will be replaced by a land for sky train. In the area off passport control customs will provide more convenient places.
In the present, there are a small place spend for walkway with 8 gates will be destroyed and grew in size become sky train with 18 gates. A new shop will be sited under the sky train and the area of security passport control will be added a bag drop and repalced the position of check-in. Check-in will move to the opposite the original place and cafe will change place to the corner.
In the place of passport control customs, it was exxpand in the corner to add car hire. In the right side, a new cafe will be built and an ATM also was provided under the cafe.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 10
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 674.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37662337662 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24250781238 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9107320599 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.25 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891988292339 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434668679017 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025974218025 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596189385591 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198969348759 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.