The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The provided table represents the total number of visitors, who visited to Ashdown Museum and the pie charts illustrate an overview of the satisfaction ratio of the people for after and before refurbishment of the museum.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the higher number of people visited to the museum after refurbishment compared to before refurbishment. In addition, a significant number of people were “very dissatisfied” before refurbishment; whereas, it was ”satisfied” after refurbishment.
Total 74,000 people visited at the Ashdown museum during the year before refurbishment. At that time, the greatest number of people were “dissatisfied“ and it was 40 people, while, 30 people were “satisfied”. Moreover, the number of people, who were ”very satisfied” and “very dissatisfied“ was 15 and 10 people respectively. Only 5 people were not responded in the survey.
On the other hand, 92,000 people visited to the museum during the year after refurbishment. At the same time, the highest number of people were “satisfied“ and it was 40; in contrast, 15 people were “dissatisfied”. The number of ”very satisfied” people were 35.
- Take a look at the graphic and complete the task.The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison 61
- Take a look at the graphics and complete the task.The charts show where people get their news and how much they trust these sources.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spen 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87777777778 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.41440892678 2.65546596893 166% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5791286733 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193387719223 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122174879614 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581209802585 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154528206182 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159591228268 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.