The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015.
The given table compares three different companies through the shares of their women participation in senior management positions over the period of 40 years starting from 1975.
It is clear that the trend for all three companies generally rose with some level offs and downturns throughout the period. Interestingly, the figure for all three companies reached its highest point in 2015.
While the Eldan Ltd started the period with the least proportions among the other two at 3%, the Finsbury Ltd witnessed the opposite at 16%. By the year 1980, the figure for the Finsbury Ltd declined to 14%, whereas the Eldan Ltd undergo no changes. In followed 5 years, the proportion of women occupied with senior posts at Finsbury Ltd increased by 1%, while the figure for the Eldan Ltd soared to 14%. In 1990, the figure for the Eldan company two folded at 28% and continued growing with reaching its peak in 2015 at 64% the highest for the three companies, while the Finsbury Ltd witnessed 7% rise and decreased again in the next following 5 years by 2% then hit its highest point in the final year at 26%.
Interestingly, the proportion of women occupied in senior posts at Bamforth company was 9% and rose 2% in every 5 year period till 2000. Following from 2000 the figure skyrocketed at 46% in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | rajpatel90 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | AKHYAR ALI | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | Dave Skylark | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | Ismoilkhon | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Muslima1998 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 78
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 77
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 67
- The given line graph below illustrates the number of people moved from rural to urban areas of three different countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76548672566 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52819096385 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504424778761 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8621208898 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179598086849 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939194439215 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934323185951 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158397387759 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102022204953 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.