The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table provide statistics regarding the proportion of women holding senior positions of three firms from 1975 to 2015.
In general, it can be seen that all three companies witnessed an upward trend, with Eldan holding the lead at the end of the examined period.
Only 3% of senior management positions belonged to women in Eldan in 1975. This figure remained stable across 1980 before surging to 14% in 1985. Subsequent to a two-fold increase to 28% in 1990, it skyrocketed to 33% and 64% in 2000 and 2015 respectively, higher than the other firms. Meanwhile, the participation of females in senior management in Bamforth Ltd rose steadily at a 2% rate every five years from 9% in 1975 to17% in 2000. A further escalation to 46% in 2015 saw it end up just behind that in Eldan.
The rate of women in senior roles in Finsbury oscillated between 14% and 16% during the first 10 years before rising to 22% in 1990. After a slight decline to 20% in 2000, it enjoyed an upswing 26% in 2015, despite losing out to the other two companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | rajpatel90 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | AKHYAR ALI | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | Dave Skylark | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The plan below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: After
...oss 1980 before surging to 14% in 1985. Subsequent to a two-fold increase to 28% in 1990, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59893048128 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54600497352 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631016042781 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2401907369 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197315361196 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787312047212 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659660540248 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116466681269 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559199583392 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.