In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
It is a common occurrence in some nations around the world that people are taking an interest in learning about the history of their own accommodations. This trend stems from many reasons and it can be perpetuated by several methods.
The fact that people are interested in discovering the past of their house and building is reasonable in many ways. First and foremost, gaining an understanding of the history of where they live gives people a sense of knowledge. With a vast knowledge of their accommodation throughout the time, people are acquainted to its features and characteristics. As a result, their well-being during the living experience is guaranteed. Secondly, this activity provides residents with a feeling of pride. Knowing the history of accommodations helps increase people's gratitude and appreciation of their privilege to owns a living place. For example, Vietnamese are grateful for their inheritance of houses from ancestors and often go to great lengths to preserve their prized possessions.
In the modern age, a plethora of options is available for people to do research about the history of their house or building. Firstly, people can use documents about the evolution of their accommodation. Recorded material pictures and papers assists people in gaining an insight into the place they live throughout the time accurately. Moreover, the Internet is a considerable choice as it is home to a massive amount of knowledge. To cite an example, many websites on the Internet provides precise information of houses and buildings and their evolution.
In conclusion, there is pragmatic justification why people in many countries are interested in studying the past of the place they live in. This trend is made possible by a number of methods available to the vast majority of the people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 82
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The plan below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. Recorded material pictures and papers assists people in gaining an insight int...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23711340206 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08539017033 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53264604811 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6434795025 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.25 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331250879379 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107826888491 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605063555695 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209985912729 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017784216205 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.