The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar graphs display the proportion of employed men and women from 60 to 64 years old in four countries in 1970 and 2000.
In general, all four countries witnessed a decreased in the number of working people aged 60 to 64. It is also apparent that the percentage of men were higher than that of women across 4 countries.
In 1970, 86% of men from 60 to 64 years old participated in the workforce in the USA, closed followed by Indonesia with a 2% deficit. Meanwhile, Belgium and Japan recorded the lowest figures with 79% and 76%. The proportion of working 60 to 64-year-old women in the USA was 78%. Indonesia and Belgium followed with the numbers for both countries exceeded 60%, whilst only 56% of Japanese women in this age group were employed.
It can be seen that the statistics for all countries dwindled in 2000. In terms of men, America and Indonesia continued to be the top countries with 78% and 74% respectively. While the number of employed Japanese males decreased to 63%, it led Belgium by an 11% gap. Regarding women, Indonesia stayed at first place with 50%, ahead of Japan (47%) and the USA (45%). The percentage of Belgian women from 60 to 64 years old was significantly lower that other countries with only 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-02 | minhpn | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | buiminhduc | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | abread | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | dinhthu05 | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | Dave Skylark | 82 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant In 2010 there were 750 000 visitors residi 73
- The chart below shows the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to the housing preferences of people in the UK 73
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 73
- The plan below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61538461538 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61351292841 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524886877828 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4044337957 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269401607135 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109103502101 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810306599609 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211313338499 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711151368916 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.