The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011.
The table illustrates the proportion of males and females who cycled in different age groups in a city in 2011. Overall, it is clear that the number of male cyclists is lower than female counterparts in all ranges of ages. Moreover, the figure for both genders in the age group 18 – 39 was lower than the others.
Over half of girls from 0 to 9 years old rode bikes, which was 1% higher than that of boys, at 51,3% and 50,3% respectively. Then, the percentage of teenage girls who cycled was approximately 2 times higher than that of boys who rode bikes in the next age group (10 – 17), at 42,2% and 24,6%.
The figure for both sexual groups decreased gradually in the following age groups. Female cyclists contributed 17,1% while the opposite group was just at 17,1% in the young adult group. The proportion of both men and women who rode bikes in the middle age group was at the lowest, at 12,3% and 8,0% respectively. There was a slight increase of around 6% in two sexual groups in the last age class (60+), at 18,5% for women and 13,2% for men who rode bicycles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-09 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 66
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age group in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age group in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41414141414 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38135463828 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8735071517 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240098204829 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114483945568 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755131911817 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167101953619 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00925671834047 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.