The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 ( tonnes )
The table compares the manufacture of cocoa beans in six areas in a 6-year period
Overall, Asia was the largest region when it comes to the production of cocoa beans, while Africa produced the least amount of them. With the exception of Asia and Oceania, others’ figure was witnessed with many fluctuations throughout the examined years
There were 46000 tonnes of cocoa beans made in North and Central America in 1992, this figure then nearly declined in half, at 25000 in 1994 and grew back to the same tonnes of beans as in 1992. The figure for Africa was lower with the exception of the year 1994 when this nation made 29000 tonnes of cocoa beans in the beginning year but ended up at 25000. The greatest amount of cocoa beans was made in Asia which had its figure rose significantly till it reached the highest data with 436000 tonnes in 1998
In 1992, there were merely 40000 cocoa beans produced in Oceania, subsequently, this figure was seen with a continuous increase to 76890 tonnes in 1998. South America also produced a vast number of these beans when there were 143000 tonnes was made in this region. Although in the later period, this figure was witnessed with a nearly 30000 decrease in 1996, it grew up to 389000 tonnes in the final year. England’s cocoa beans production was also modest when there were 56000 tonnes was manufactured in 1992, after many fluctuations finally it stayed at 49000 tonnes in 1998, which was 8 times lower than that of South America
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 73
- The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: Except; Except for
...rica produced the least amount of them. With the exception of Asia and Oceania, others’ figure was wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...n 1992. The figure for Africa was lower with the exception of the year 1994 when this nation made 290...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... highest data with 436000 tonnes in 1998 In 1992, there were merely 40000 cocoa b...
^^^
Line 4, column 628, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...8 times lower than that of South America
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71923076923 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29360765927 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473076923077 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.9602761554 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.285714286 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1428571429 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288482970764 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156695118758 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697062216306 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193148571469 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658069482809 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.