The table illustrates the percentage of the six primary types of households living in poverty in Australia in the year 1999.
Overall, it is clear that poverty rates were higher in single citizens than couples, and people with children were generally poorer than households without kids. However, levels of poverty were lower among the elderly. Units are measured in percentages.
The poverty rate in all types of households in Australia was at 11% (1,837,000 citizens). Particularly, 21% of single parents were in poverty, 3% higher than the figure for single people with no kids. Just 12% of families with kids (933,000 people) were in poverty in that year.
Meanwhile, the poverty rate in families with no children dropped to just 7%, significantly higher than the levels of poverty among aged people. The figure for poor single elders was followed by the proportion of aged couples in poverty, at 6% and 4% (54,000 people and 48,000 people) respectively.
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker. 67
- The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The two maps show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ithout kids. However, levels of poverty were lower among the elderly. Units are meas...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14012738854 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65127340717 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8279840168 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169556771297 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802960000693 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817158270339 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132379216485 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879203823276 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.