The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The chart gives information about the type of families that live in poverty in Australia and the proportions of them in 1999.
6% of single and aged people live in poverty while the percentage of aged couples is not only much lower than single and aged people but also the lowest one with 4% of the proportion. That means 54,000 and 48,000 single and aged people and aged couples are living in poverty respectively. In contrast, singles that have no children live way more in poverty than aged ones with 19% which is 359,000 people.
Couples with no children proportion are lower than singles with no children. There are 211,000 couples with no children who live in poverty. The greatest percentage number for people living in poverty is 21% who are categorised as sole parents which means 232,000 of them living in poverty. Even though the percentage of parents that are defined as couples is 12%, the number is the greatest with 933,000 people.
In general, all households' poverty percentage is 11%. There are 1,837,000 people that live in poverty in Australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Mubashir123 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-12-01 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
- In some societies stress is now regarded as a major problem and it is thought that people suffer from more stress than they did in the past However others feel that the amount of stress people have today is exaggerated They say that the previous generatio 56
- The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years Many of the problems young people now experience such as juvenile delinquency arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their childre 56
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 56
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 67
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'households'' or 'household's'?
Suggestion: households'; household's
...ith 933,000 people. In general, all households poverty percentage is 11%. There are 1,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90659340659 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46259911411 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445054945055 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0535891026 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188613949815 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107395907229 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101159423505 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18111608234 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111123659724 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.