The table below shows the proportion of families of different categories living in poverty in Australia in 1999
The table below elucidates the percentage of households of different categories experiencing poverty in Australia in 1999.
Overall, the biggest proportion amount to the unmarried people and single parents while the least is dominated by both solo elderly person and elderly couples. However, all people living in poverty make up 12 % of the entire population in Australia.
As it stands out from the chart that Solo parents amounted to 21 % with 232000 people. Next on the list is single people with 19 % slightly less than which comes couples with children at 12 % each accounting for 359000 and 933000 people respectively. Following this, the proportion of couples without kids with 7 % making it slightly more than that of single aged people at 6 %. Finally, the smallest figure amounts to aged couples with just 4 % making them the least poor people among all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Mubashir123 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-12-01 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of families of different categories living in poverty in Australia in 1999 56
- The entertainment choices have changed now as the modern technology has provided us newer options The leisure activities earlier were more productive and were a good show of creativity Do you agree or disagree 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of the entire population in Australia. As it stands out from the chart that Solo ...
^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t on the list is single people with 19 % slightly less than which comes couples w...
^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re amounts to aged couples with just 4 % making them the least poor people among ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 720.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10638297872 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66116732681 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3836687738 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170289756305 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100945946387 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159372583315 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202434435485 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194144290565 0.0819641961636 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.