The entertainment choices have changed now as the modern technology has provided us newer options. The leisure activities earlier were more productive and were a good show of creativity.
Do you agree or disagree?
The amount of entertainment has changed over the years as the emergence of new technology created us a variety of options in this field.
Back in the days, The leisure time included activities such as playing squash or football with your friends which enriched our both childhood and adulthood. Those activities not only had a great impact on our overall happiness level but also the time spent productively. In regard to some key of benefits of the previous entertainment, youngsters could easily make friends or grow as a good team player, not to mention numerous health benefits during sport exercises which now has become rarer.
In the current society, the list has expanded filled up with various choices. However, it has widely not affected the quality of time spent, as I think with what is available now, one can easily get pleasant experience, as well as the level of creativity. I am of the opinion that the appearance of new technology would only benefit us in terms of both meaningful time and experience. Positive sides of current options definitely outweigh the shortcomings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-30 | Avazzo | 47 | view |
| 2014-07-27 | tejamalmali | 53 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of families of different categories living in poverty in Australia in 1999 56
- The entertainment choices have changed now as the modern technology has provided us newer options The leisure activities earlier were more productive and were a good show of creativity Do you agree or disagree 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, i think, such as, as well as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02747252747 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81962368841 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659340659341 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3588362927 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106709091344 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411274159373 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345665424184 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774601059172 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279373046697 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.