The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012.
The given table illustrates the survey results of the questionnaire relating to the new theatre in one town of club members and the general public in 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that almost members of the club felt completely satisfactory when rating its facilities, information and qualities. On the contrary, a small percentage of participants ranked these three categories as poor.
As per the table, the vast majority of opinions ranked theatre facilities excellent, at 72%, while 26% were satisfied and only 2% for poor. Regarding theatre information, more than half the proportion of members voted it as excellent, whereas only 16% said It is poor. In addition, a large number of people chose excellent, which was the highest percentage of the three categories, at 88% and 2% ranked to be poor.
In terms of the general public, most of the members were contented and rank it excellent and satisfied at 64% and 24% respectively. Furthermore, there are a lot of differences between excellent opinions and satisfied opinions in term of information, about 66% and 20% respectively. Additionally, the percentage of the theatre goers ranked its quality as excellent at 53% and 2% as they were poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The pie chart shows percentage of people working in different sectors between Town A and Town B in 2 different years in 1960 and 2010 84
- The maps show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tre in one town of club members and the general public in 2012. Overall, it can be seen tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... only 16% said It is poor. In addition, a large number of people chose excellent, which was the h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...% ranked to be poor. In terms of the general public, most of the members were contented and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12626262626 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05702444032 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.8253834417 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274525262593 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113087366509 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151633653965 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198397599685 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191651756389 0.0819641961636 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.