The table below shows the results of survey in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Summaríe the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The table shows the change in attitudes of the students in a particular university to different aspects of its academic provision over ten years.
Firstly, the most striking set of statistics relate to approval for electronic resources. There was a sharp increase in the number of students giving these resources a good rating, from 45 percent in 2000 to 72 percent in 2005 and 88 percent in 2010. There was also an overall improvement in attitudes of student about teaching quality, though the increase was relatively small (65 percent in 2000 to 69 percent in 2010) and had a slight decline in 2005. There was a fluctuation in attitudes to print resources, rising from 87 percent in 2000 to 89 percent in 2005 and then falling by 1 percent in 2010. Good ratings for buildings and teaching facilities were similar in three surveys, at 77 percent. Finally, there were poor ratings for range of modules offered (32 percent in 2000) and they got worse, falling from 30 percent in 2005 to 27 percent 2010.
Overall, the number of students giving good ratings for teaching quality, print resources and electron resources increases over ten years.
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which they retire from work should be raised considerably To extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows the results of survey in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summar e the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 2010 and had a slight decline in 2005. There was a fluctuation in attitudes to print...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90206185567 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6274152051 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520618556701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3258064419 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987724346556 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491352846124 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390027389886 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604571106351 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428111182074 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.