The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below illustrates results consolidated from three surveys, whose purpose are to show the changes in students’ opinions about five distinctive aspects of a university over a ten-year period, starting from 2000.
The provision of electronic resources is considered as the most improved aspect by students, with positive rating starting at only 45% in 2000, then increased nearly as double in 2005, and continued to reach a peak of 88% in 2010, making it one of two best university features. Sharing the top ranking with electronic resources at the end of the period was print resources, which had always been holding the first place of popularity in students’ minds throughout a decade.
On the other hand, the attitude of students towards “range of module offered” aspect had shown a negative tendency, with its ratings continued to decrease slightly over the years and considered the worst aspect of the school. Another interesting point to notice is that “building/teaching facilities” ratings had remained unchanged with a positive response of 77% over the period.
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably.To what extend to you agree or disagree? 82
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extend to you agree or disagree 84
- Missions to explore space are hugely expensive and there are problems on Earth which demand attention The number of these missions needs to be reduced Do you agree or disagree 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48255813953 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32888821606 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668604651163 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4859973857 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.6 112.824112599 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101721919244 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054576465071 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668836127954 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769873936936 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580479218389 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 61.2550243902 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.