The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University.
The table reveals the information about ratio of pupils grade on various aspects of McGill university with five years gap from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, Teaching quality and library was most popular in studens. All the services which provided in university was improved their rating with the time instead of range of module offered in university. Sports and social fascilities was had same rating over the time period in McGill university.
The data shows that teaching quality was fluctuated in 15 years with 74 in 2005 and slightly increased over the time,and reached 78. Library had overall increased 1 however it was 86 in 2005. Student service is only a thing which was significantly improved trough the time. In 2005 student sevice was had 54 rating, after 5 years in 2010 it reached 81 and in 2015, it was 95, which most high rating in university by student. Rang of modules offered by university had fall their rating from 39 to 25 in 15 years. However Sports and social facilities had stable rating 65 in 2005, 2010, and 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-15 | phuongchi17899 | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 11 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 26 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 67
- The bar chart below shows employment figures in different tourism related industries between 2009 and 2019
- Many think that in today s world it is very difficult for people to maintain a healthy lifestyle Others however feel that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e years gap from 2005 to 2015. Overall, Teaching quality and library was most po...
^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The data shows that teaching quality was fluctuated in 15 years with 74 in 2005 a...
^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...005 and slightly increased over the time,and reached 78. Library had overall increas...
^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'fallen'.
Suggestion: fallen
...ng of modules offered by university had fall their rating from 39 to 25 in 15 years....
^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...their rating from 39 to 25 in 15 years. However Sports and social facilities had stable...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78770949721 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47912542179 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.865969309 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203503729349 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840770475439 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810850621507 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160856020348 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937470003469 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.