The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010, and 2015 about McGill University.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table indicates the proportion of students who gave an excellent rating for numerous aspects of McGill University.
It is apparent that student services were appraised well increased year by year. Contrary to this raise, the range of modules offered was still not highly appreciated. Besides, sports and social facilities were stable.
In 2005 and 2010, Library resources were the aspect that was highly rated by students (86% and 88%). However, in 2015, this aspect declined and no longer prevailed (87%). There was a sharp increase in the number of students giving these services a good appraisal. Moreover, in 2015, it was the highest (95%).
Contrary to the increase of student services, the range of modules offered has always had the lowest rating since 2005 and gradually decreased over ten years. There still had the rise and fall in the percentage of students giving good appraisal, but trivial. Moreover, sports and social facilities did not change from 2005 to 2015 (65%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-15 | phuongchi17899 | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 11 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 26 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | AltynS | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-09 | Bimandana_26 | 95 | view |
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 26
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, moreover, so, still, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06097560976 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4716717447 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4326922951 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4545454545 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9090909091 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0712552684172 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029458897089 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029668340606 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459299165083 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271020827638 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.