The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table above provides comprehensive information on the student survey result of McGill University’s facility quality in three different years: 2005, 2010 and 2015. In brief, three aspects: teaching quality, library resources and student services, experienced an upsurge of student number giving a good rating, whereas the remaining showed a steady pattern for the sports and social facilities, and a drop for the range of modules offered.
Concerning the three first aspects, they had a distinctly increasing level since the commencement of the survey in 2005. As seen in the tabular chart, a hike only occurred in the student services, jumping from 54 to 81 and finally to 95, in 2005, 2010 and 2015, respectively. Meanwhile, the library resource percentage elevated marginally by only 1 percent between 2005 and 2015. Next, although the teaching quality category had an increase in 2015, its rate initially descended by 2 points to 72 in 2010 before going up to 78 in 2015.
Contrarily, the sports and social facilities had been levelling out since 2005 at the rate of 65. Then, a continual decrease was demonstrated in the range of modules offered category. The rating of this aspect was different amongst others and hit its lowest score of 25 at the end of 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-15 | phuongchi17899 | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 11 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 26 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | AltynS | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-09 | Bimandana_26 | 95 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 78
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from the school To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 78
- Global Warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measure can government and individuals take to tackle the issue 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, whereas, while, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07619047619 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82802624215 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604761904762 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8015499465 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179566148451 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756059611327 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852557873012 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113820895976 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578058298696 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.