The table depicts five foremost countries about the data of foreigner visiting their country between 2012 and 2013.
Overall, the highest number of tourists belonged to France, compared to Italy, which was the lowest ones. The country that digested the most money for tourism was the USA, in contrast to Italy, which had the least money spending for tourism.
The France was the most popular destination that attracted a huge number of tourists, over 80 million people traveling to this place in 2013. Opposite, Italy slightly increased the number of travelers paying a visit, which reached under 50 million people in 2012 and 2013 respectively.
As the table shows, there was a significant difference of those countries about their strategy of paying money for tourism. Particularly, the USA spent the highest money, which gained more than 200 billion dollars in the period from 2012 to 2013. It was the dramatic number that compared to Italy, which just spent about 80 billion dollars for those years.
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in2012 and 2013. 73
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 67
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication Do the benefits of globalization outweigh the drawbacks Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own k 61
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13939393939 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41493668487 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 13.4297943022 43.030603864 31% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220784259876 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107166176772 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958238097483 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151589803928 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815214375522 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.